Skip to main content
26 published firms · Scores updated Oct 15, 2026

Prop Firm Reviews & Comparison

Unbiased, Data-Driven Analysis

PropMason ranks published prop firms on the terms they actually publish — account prices, risk rules, payout conditions and reputation — each figure dated to the day it was read. Commercial links never buy placement.

Firms tracked26
Average published profit split88%
Evidence before promotionNo paid placement
New to prop firms? Start here

Why PropMason

  • No paid placement

    No paid placement. The published order follows the score and source-dated evidence only.

  • Live Verification

    Every public data point carries a source and observation date; refresh cadence varies by source.

  • Silent Change Alerts

    Detected rule changes are retained with old and new values when evidence is available.

  • Composite Score

    The PropMason score weighs risk, payout terms, price, trading rules and reputation. A term we could not confirm on the firm's own pages scores a fixed low value.

Firms tracked

Live prop firm logos from our database

A rotating sample of active firms tracked by PropMason.

HyroTrader logoLark Funding logoFTMO logoTake Profit Trader logoBulenox logoFundedNext logoFunding Pips logoMENT Funding logoLux Trading Firm logoThe5ers logo

Affiliate Disclosure: PropMason may earn a commission when you visit a prop firm through our links. This never affects our scores, rankings, or reviews. Learn about our affiliate policy

Evidence-led prop-firm rankings

Prop Firm Database

PropMason tracks 26 published prop firms and ranks them on the terms they publish — read from each firm's own pages and scored the same way for everyone. Brands run by the same company share one place in the list.

Risk 26%Payout 20%Reputation 9%Rule clarity 15%Other factors 30%

How to read this ranking

A high Trustpilot rating cannot carry a weak firm. Pick the criterion that matches how you trade, then open Why this rank? to see what drives the score and when it was last checked.

Read the scoring methodology

Rank firms by

Balanced ranking: risk, payout and rule clarity carry the most weight, while cost, reputation, evaluation, profit split and counterparty standing keep one attractive metric from dominating.

This criterion ranks 25 of the 25 listed firms, on the terms they publish. A score reads the paperwork — it cannot tell whether a firm pays on time.

  1. 01
    HyroTrader logo
    HyroTrader

    80% split · Payout schedule varies

    6.9/ 10
    A
    Static drawdown model

    From $59

    Drawdown

    • 6% static on One-Step
    • 10% static on Two-Step
    • 5% static on Zero-Step
    Why this rank?

    Supported strengths

    • Static drawdown model

    Cautions / limits

    • No material cautions on record.

    Where these figures come from

    Trustpilot 4.0 from 229 reviews.

    Score last updated Oct 15, 2026.

    Trustpilot last checked Oct 12, 2026.

    See the full firm breakdown
  2. 02
    Lark Funding logo
    Lark Funding

    80–90% split · Payout schedule varies

    6.5/ 10
    A
    90%+ profit split

    From $105

    Drawdown

    • 7% static on 1-Step
    • 12% static on 1-Step Max
    • 5% static on 3-Step
    • +1 more
    Why this rank?

    Supported strengths

    • Established review sample
    • 90%+ profit split

    Cautions / limits

    • No material cautions on record.

    Where these figures come from

    Trustpilot 4.3 from 520 reviews.

    Score last updated Oct 15, 2026.

    Trustpilot last checked Oct 12, 2026.

    See the full firm breakdown
  3. 03
    FTMO logo
    FTMO

    80–90% split · Bi-weekly payouts

    6.4/ 10

    Tied score

    B
    90%+ profit split
    • On 1-Step, no single day may account for more than 50% of positive days' profit when you request a payout.

    From €79

    Drawdown

    • 10% trailing EOD on 1-Step
    • 10% static on 2-Step Standard

    Bi-weekly payouts

    Why this rank?

    Supported strengths

    • Established review sample
    • 90%+ profit split

    Cautions / limits

    • 50% consistency on 1-StepOn 1-Step, no single day may account for more than 50% of positive days' profit when you request a payout.

    Where these figures come from

    Trustpilot 4.8 from 54K reviews.

    Score last updated Oct 12, 2026.

    Trustpilot last checked Oct 12, 2026.

    See the full firm breakdown
  4. 04
    Take Profit Trader logo
    Take Profit Trader

    80% split · On-demand payouts

    6.4/ 10

    Tied score

    B
    • On Trading Test, no single day may account for more than 50% of profit when you request a payout.

    From $150

    Drawdown

    • 3–6% trailing EOD on Trading Test

    On-demand payouts

    Why this rank?

    Supported strengths

    • Established review sample

    Cautions / limits

    • 50% consistency on Trading TestOn Trading Test, no single day may account for more than 50% of profit when you request a payout.

    Where these figures come from

    Trustpilot 4.4 from 11K reviews.

    Score last updated Oct 9, 2026.

    Trustpilot last checked Oct 12, 2026.

    See the full firm breakdown
  5. 05
    Bulenox logo
    Bulenox

    90% split · Monthly payouts

    6.2/ 10

    Tied score

    B
    90%+ profit split

    From $94

    Drawdown

    • 3.67–4.5% trailing EOD on Fast Track eod, Momentum eod
    • 3.67–4.5% trailing on Fast Track trailing, Momentum trailing
    • 3–6% trailing EOD on Qualification eod
    • +1 more

    Monthly payouts

    Why this rank?

    Supported strengths

    • Established review sample
    • 90%+ profit split

    Cautions / limits

    • No material cautions on record.

    Where these figures come from

    Trustpilot 4.7 from 1.8K reviews.

    Score last updated Oct 13, 2026.

    Trustpilot last checked Oct 12, 2026.

    See the full firm breakdown
  6. 06
    FundedNext logo
    FundedNext

    80–95% split · Bi-weekly payouts

    6.2/ 10

    Tied score

    B
    90%+ profit split
    • On Legacy, no single day may account for more than 40% of profit when you request a payout.

    From $32.99

    Drawdown

    • 2.5–3% trailing EOD on Flex
    • 2.5–4% trailing EOD on Rapid Daily, Rapid Pro
    • 6% static on Stellar 1-Step
    • +2 more

    Bi-weekly payouts

    Why this rank?

    Supported strengths

    • Established review sample
    • 90%+ profit split

    Cautions / limits

    • 40% consistency on LegacyOn Legacy, no single day may account for more than 40% of profit when you request a payout.

    Where these figures come from

    Trustpilot 4.5 from 81K reviews.

    Score last updated Oct 15, 2026.

    Trustpilot last checked Oct 12, 2026.

    See the full firm breakdown
  7. 07
    Funding Pips logo
    Funding Pips

    80–95% split · On-demand payouts

    6.2/ 10

    Tied score

    B
    90%+ profit split
    • On Zero, no single day may account for more than 15% of profit when you request a payout.

    From $33

    Drawdown

    • 12% static on One Step Flex, Two Step Flex
    • 10% static on Two Step
    • 6% static on Two Step Pro
    • +1 more

    On-demand payouts

    Why this rank?

    Supported strengths

    • Established review sample
    • 90%+ profit split

    Cautions / limits

    • 15% consistency on ZeroOn Zero, no single day may account for more than 15% of profit when you request a payout.

    Where these figures come from

    Trustpilot 4.5 from 70K reviews.

    Score last updated Oct 15, 2026.

    Trustpilot last checked Oct 12, 2026.

    See the full firm breakdown
  8. 08
    MENT Funding logo
    MENT Funding

    75–80% split · Payout schedule varies

    6.2/ 10

    Tied score

    B

    From $220

    Drawdown

    • 6% static on Equities Static, Forex 1-Step
    • 6% trailing on Equities Trailing
    • static on Futures 1-Step
    Why this rank?

    Supported strengths

    • Nothing stands out versus peers.

    Cautions / limits

    • No material cautions on record.

    Where these figures come from

    Trustpilot 4.7 from 232 reviews.

    Score last updated Oct 15, 2026.

    Trustpilot last checked Oct 12, 2026.

    See the full firm breakdown
  9. 09
    Lux Trading Firm logo
    Lux Trading Firm

    80% split · Payout schedule varies

    6.2/ 10

    Tied score

    B

    From £199

    Drawdown

    • 6% static on 1-Step Evaluation, Instant Funding
    Why this rank?

    Supported strengths

    • Established review sample

    Cautions / limits

    • No material cautions on record.

    Where these figures come from

    Trustpilot 3.9 from 635 reviews.

    Score last updated Oct 15, 2026.

    Trustpilot last checked Oct 12, 2026.

    See the full firm breakdown
  10. 10
    The5ers logo
    The5ers

    80–100% split · Bi-weekly payouts

    Also operatesTrade The Pool5.4

    Five Percent Online Ltd owns both brands, so it holds one place in this ranking instead of two. Each brand keeps its own score, and you can open either one.

    6.1/ 10
    B
    90%+ profit split

    From $19

    Drawdown

    • 4% EOD on Futures Day Trade, Futures Swing

    Bi-weekly payouts

    Why this rank?

    Supported strengths

    • Established review sample
    • 90%+ profit split

    Cautions / limits

    • No material cautions on record.

    Where these figures come from

    Trustpilot 4.7 from 40K reviews.

    Score last updated Oct 12, 2026.

    Trustpilot last checked Oct 12, 2026.

    See the full firm breakdown

Showing the top 10 of 25 ranked firms for Overall.

View full ranking

Popular Comparisons

See how top firms compare on the metrics that matter most.

HyroTraderVSLark Funding
6.9Score6.5
80%Profit Split80–90%
—Max Account—
FTMOVSTake Profit Trader
6.4Score6.4
80–90%Profit Split80%
$200KMax Account$150K
CHANGELOG

Latest Rule Changes

Firm rules checked daily; every change recorded.

City Traders ImperiumObserved change

City Traders Imperium changed ea allowed on 2-step $50,000 (CFD accounts) from allowed to restricted

allowedrestricted
3d ago
City Traders ImperiumObserved change

City Traders Imperium changed ea allowed on 2-step $5,000 (CFD accounts) from allowed to restricted

allowedrestricted
3d ago
City Traders ImperiumObserved change

City Traders Imperium changed ea allowed on 2-step $25,000 (CFD accounts) from allowed to restricted

allowedrestricted
3d ago
City Traders ImperiumObserved change

City Traders Imperium changed ea allowed on 2-step $2,500 (CFD accounts) from allowed to restricted

allowedrestricted
3d ago
City Traders ImperiumObserved change

City Traders Imperium changed ea allowed on 2-step $10,000 (CFD accounts) from allowed to restricted

allowedrestricted
3d ago
Academy

Learn Before You Fund

Data-backed educational guides for prop traders at every level.

Integrity & Trust

Every score is documented: how offers are evaluated, how programs are balanced, and what must be true before a number is published.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about prop firms and how PropMason works.

A prop firm funds traders with its capital. Traders pass an evaluation, then trade a funded account and keep a share of profits (typically 70-90%).

Proprietary (prop) trading firms provide traders with company capital to trade financial markets. The typical flow: you pay an evaluation fee, pass a challenge by meeting profit targets without exceeding drawdown limits, then receive a funded account. Profits are split between you and the firm. Key metrics to compare: drawdown rules (trailing vs static vs EOD), profit targets, payout frequency, and allowed trading instruments. PropMason tracks all these data points across dozens of firms to help you make informed decisions.

Our composite score weighs 12+ quantitative metrics: drawdown limits, profit splits, payout terms, account sizes, allowed tools, and historical rule stability.

PropMason uses a data-driven scoring system that affiliate commissions cannot influence. The overall score (0-10) is computed from quantitative factors including: maximum drawdown percentage, daily drawdown limits, profit split ratio, profit-to-drawdown ratio (PD ratio), minimum and maximum account sizes, evaluation steps required, payout frequency and minimums, allowed trading tools (EA, HFT, copy trading), platform availability, average spreads, and historical rule change frequency. We also monitor for silent rule changes that firms make without announcement, which negatively impacts their score.

Some links here earn us a commission, and we disclose them. No firm can pay for a rank, a score, or a review. Data comes from official firm pages, dated at the time we read it.

Some links on PropMason earn us a commission when you sign up with a firm, and we disclose those on our affiliate disclosure page. The commission buys nothing else. No firm pays for a higher rank, a better score, or a review, and we don't run sponsored content. Scores are built from the firm's own pages and terms documents, each observation dated so you can see how current it is, using the method published on our methodology page. When a firm quietly changes a rule, our monitoring catches it and the change goes into the public changelog whether the firm announced it or not. Think a score or a link is wrong? Email support@propmason.com with the URL and what you saw, and we'll correct it.

We check each firm's pages every day; when a rule changes, the changelog on the firm's page shows the old and new values within about a day.

We read each firm's pricing, terms and FAQ pages every day. When a rule changes — say a drawdown limit moves from 5% to 4% — the change is logged with the old value, the new value, the date it was found and the page it came from, and the changelog on the firm's page keeps the full history. Editorial write-ups like the risk analysis are refreshed separately.

Yes. Our comparison tool lets you select 2-4 firms and view metrics side-by-side: drawdown rules, profit splits, account sizes, platforms, and scores.

The comparison feature at /compare allows you to select multiple prop firms and view all their metrics in a structured side-by-side table. Compared dimensions include: evaluation structure (steps, targets, time limits), risk management (drawdown type, max drawdown, daily limits), economics (profit split, payout frequency, payout minimums), trading conditions (spreads, platforms, allowed tools), and overall scores. You can share comparison links with others. The comparison data uses the same cached dataset as the main listings, so it's always up-to-date.

Trust and Methodology

OUR INDEPENDENCE
◆No paid placement
◈9 scoring dimensions
◇Source-dated evidence

INDEPENDENCE

PropMason does not accept payment from prop trading firms for rankings or reviews. All scores are computed from publicly available data using a transparent methodology. Some links on this site may be affiliate links. Our rankings and scores are never influenced by partnerships.

METHODOLOGY

PropMason evaluates each offer on the terms it publishes, balances programs against each other, and publishes only evidence-backed firm scores.

READ METHODOLOGY

DATA SOURCES

Evidence may include official firm pages, terms, public review platforms, and dated canonical records. Refresh cadence varies by source.

Data last updated: Oct 15, 2026

Affiliate Disclosure: PropMason may earn a commission when you visit a prop firm through our links. This never affects our scores, rankings, or reviews.Learn about our affiliate policy · Read our editorial policy